CLANCY PC - IP LAW
  • Home
  • About
  • PAULA's BIO
  • Contact
  • IP Blog

@CanadianIP News


Follow us on Twitter @CanadianIP
Follow us on LinkedIn @ClancyPC
Follow us on Facebook @ClancypcIP
Follow us on Instagram @ClancyPClaw

CLANCY PC CLIENT HAYABUSA FIGHTWEAR FEATURED AS PART OF IPIC's #OWNIT CAMPAIGN

30/10/2020

0 Comments

 
Hayabusa CEO, Ken Clement, discusses the importance of having an IP strategy and securing IP protection in the fight against counterfeits.  A good defence is always the best offence — even outside the ring.
0 Comments

should 21 savage consider a trademark registration? YESSIRSKIIi!

28/10/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Photo by C D-X on Unsplash
21 Savage recently took to Twitter to express his frustration over individuals profiting from the use of the word “Yessirskiii”, a word he claims to have coined in his 2020 song Yessirskiii. According to 21 Savage, authorship of this word should entitle him to 50 percent of the profits from every song that uses the Yessirskiii hook.
 
Although 21 Savage may have coined the word Yessirskiii, and while he may very well have copyright in his “Yessirskiii” song, to enforce ownership rights over the word Yessirskiii and to claim infringement, he would need to pursue a trademark registration.
 
If you have questions about ownership or how trademark protection can benefit you, please contact us at Clancy PC!
0 Comments

THe battle for 'qned'

19/10/2020

0 Comments

 
By Trish Sawhney
Picture
Photo by israel palacio on Unsplash
Samsung Displays, the display making affiliate of Samsung Electronics, has filed trademark applications in the United States, Korea, Australia, and Europe for QNED. QNED is an acronym for "quantum nano-emitting diode" which is a new type of display technology.

Samsung Display’s QNED application comes just weeks after LG Electronics also filed trademark applications for QNED. The two Korean tech companies have been competing globally in the electronic market for years. It will be interesting to see which company, if any, emerges victorious in this trademark battle. There may be an argument that QNED lacks distinctiveness or that it is descriptive of quantum nano-emitting diode display technology, which means that neither company may be able to monopolize this term.

For further information about what potential pitfalls you may encounter in the trademark registration process, please contact us. 
0 Comments

so much to be thankful for....

15/10/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Is there a nicer surprise than receiving fresh flowers from a client?  A big, heartfelt thank you to our friends at Liuming International for the gorgeous flowers.  We are happy to celebrate the Harvest Moon Festival with you and we thank you so very much for the beautiful gift. We are so grateful for our clients in Canada and around the world who permit us to do what we absolutely LOVE to do each and every day.  
0 Comments

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IS YOUR MOST VALUABLE ASSET - CELEBRATING IPIC's "own your Ip" campaign

9/10/2020

0 Comments

 
0 Comments

Cannabis owners face another set-back in the U.s.

8/10/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Photo by Kimzy Nanney on Unsplash
By Paula Clancy
Cannabis trademark owners are not able to obtain Federal Trademark Registrations in the U.S. This position was affirmed by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") last month in In Re NL LLC, wherein the Board held that for a trademark to meet the "use in commerce" requirement, the use must be "lawful". 

Although cannabis and CBD products have been legalized in several U.S. states, the Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetics Act (FDCA) and the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) prohibit the sale of products containing cannabis.

The Applicant argued that under Colorado state law, its use was indeed "lawful", however the TTAB rejected this argument. “The fact that the provision of a product or service may be lawful within a state is irrelevant to the question of federal registration when it is unlawful under federal law”. Under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, in cases where  there is conflict between federal and state law, federal law prevails. 

This is of course disappointing to cannabis brand owners who are excluded from the benefit of Federal Trademark Registration.  The upcoming U.S. election may provide some solace given that Biden/Harris have vowed to legalize cannabis if they win.

We will continue to track these developments as cannabis is a growing sector in Canada, and many Canadian companies are anxiously awaiting the decriminalization of cannabis in the U.S.

Please contact us for further information on protecting your brands worldwide.
0 Comments

Ontario to modernize its corporate laws

7/10/2020

0 Comments

 
By Paula Clancy
Picture
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
The Government of Ontario has introduced legislation to modernize its Business Corporations Act. Pursuant to Bill 213, the Canadian residency requirements for the board of directors of Ontario corporations would be eliminated.  Currently the Ontario BCA requires that at least 25% of the directors be Canadian residents.  Consequently, many foreign companies opt to incorporate in other jurisdictions offering more flexibility. Bill 213 further proposes to lower the threshold for resolutions adopted by written resolution (as opposed to by vote at a meeting of shareholders) from "unanimous" to "majority" approval. 

​These are both welcome changes as they reduce the administrative burden, and add flexibility to Ontario corporations.
0 Comments

WALDORF ASTORIA mark in USE in Canada - despite lack of waldorf hotels

5/10/2020

2 Comments

 
By Sukey Omran
Picture
Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash
In the recent decision of Miller Thomson LLP v Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, the Federal Court of Appeal provided more clarity on what constitutes use of a mark in relation to "hotel services" in Canada. 
 
The owner of the WALDORF ASTORIA brand, Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP, has been trying to defend its registration from a non-use cancellation proceeding.  The requesting party argued that the WALDORF ASTORIA brand was not in use in Canada since there is no 'bricks and mortar' hotel that is available in Canada.

Hilton maintained that the mark was indeed in use in Canada since Canadian consumers could access the online reservation, booking, and payment services to book at the chain's other WALDORF ASTORIA hotels around the world.  This would fall within a broad interpretation of "hotel services".  
 
The Federal Court of Appeal made three important assessments:
  1. The ordinary commercial meaning of hotel services has changed overtime to include online services that may seem ancillary, such as reservations and bookings;
  2. Registered trademarks cannot be faulted for using pre-approved terms that were found in the Goods and Services Manual at their time of registration;
  3. There must be a sufficient degree of interactivity between the trademark owner and the Canadian consumer when offering services over the internet (viewing a website it not enough).
The use requirement for registered marks is important because it permits third parties to remove 'deadwood' (i.e. marks that are no longer in use) from the Canadian Trademarks Register. The use requirement balances the monopolistic rights that brand owners obtain through trademark registration, since there is no rationale to protect and grant such a broad scope of protection to marks that are no longer in use in the Canadian marketplace. 
 
Do you have a question about the use requirements for your trademark? Schedule an appointment with us.
2 Comments

    Archives

    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    December 2017
    May 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    July 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014

    Categories

    All
    Appointments
    Awards
    Brexit
    EUTMs
    Paula Clancy
    Trademarks
    UKIPO
    WTR 1000

Clancy PC

28 Deakin Street, Suite 201
Ottawa Ontario K2E 8B7
​Canada
pclancy@clancypc.com
Review us on Google
© Clancy PC, 2020
  • Home
  • About
  • PAULA's BIO
  • Contact
  • IP Blog